You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wild-type APC predicts poor prognosis in microsatellite-stable proximal colon cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/bjc.2015.296 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert N Jorissen, Michael Christie, Dmitri Mouradov, Anuratha Sakthianandeswaren, Shan Li, Christopher Love, Zheng-Zhou Xu, Peter L Molloy, Ian T Jones, Stephen McLaughlin, Robyn L Ward, Nicholas J Hawkins, Andrew R Ruszkiewicz, James Moore, Antony W Burgess, Dana Busam, Qi Zhao, Robert L Strausberg, Lara Lipton, Jayesh Desai, Peter Gibbs, Oliver M Sieber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#3,161
of 11,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,018
of 282,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#54
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.