| Title |
Ecosystem services in coupled social–ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0651-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Nassl, Jörg Löffler |
| Abstract |
Both the 'cascade model' of ecosystem service provision and the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response framework individually contribute to the understanding of human-nature interactions in social-ecological systems (SES). Yet, as several points of criticism show, they are limited analytical tools when it comes to reproducing complex cause-effect relationships in such systems. However, in this paper, we point out that by merging the two models, they can mutually enhance their comprehensiveness and overcome their individual conceptual deficits. Therefore we closed a cycle of ecosystem service provision and societal feedback by rethinking and reassembling the core elements of both models. That way, we established a causal sequence apt to describe the causes of change to SES, their effects and their consequences. Finally, to illustrate its functioning we exemplified and discussed our approach based on a case study conducted in the Alpujarra de la Sierra in southern Spain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 20% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 89 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,845,823
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,087
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,949
of 270,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.