↓ Skip to main content

The sample that would not clot

Overview of attention for article published in Clinica Chimica Acta, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The sample that would not clot
Published in
Clinica Chimica Acta, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cca.2018.06.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sydney W Strickland, Emily Burns, Surabhi Palkimas, Lindsay A L Bazydlo

Abstract

Vitamin K is a vital component within both the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascade as certain factors (II, VII, IX, X and protein C and S) utilize vitamin K as a cofactor during post translational modification. Deficiency of vitamin K can result in the inability to properly form blood clots, both in vivo and in vitro, due to reduced vitamin K dependent factor levels and function. Vitamin K deficiency can result from congenital causes, such as VKOR or CYP2C9 mutations, or acquired causes, such as nutritional deficiencies, antibiotic therapy, or supra-therapeutic warfarin dosing. In this case we present a patient with multifactorial vitamin K deficiency (due to nutritional defects and multiple genetic mutations in VKOR and CYP2C9) that was exacerbated by antibiotic and warfarin therapy during her hospital admission. This case displays the importance of genetic testing prior to warfarin dosing and the role antibiotics play in the coagulation cascade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinica Chimica Acta
#3,395
of 4,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,686
of 342,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinica Chimica Acta
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.