| Title |
Genetic characterization of free-ranging Asiatic wild ass in Central Asia as a basis for future conservation strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1086-3 |
| Authors |
Petra Kaczensky, Ekaterina Kovtun, Rustam Habibrakhmanov, Mahmoud-Reza Hemami, Amirhossein Khaleghi, John D. C. Linnell, Eldar Rustamov, Sergey Sklyarenko, Chris Walzer, Steffen Zuther, Ralph Kuehn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 8 | 16% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Turkmenistan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
| Scientists | 11 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#708,095
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#25
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,222
of 344,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.