↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Identification of the Interaction Between the Human Homologue of the Arabidopsis COP9 Signalosome Subunit 7a and Olig1

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Identification of the Interaction Between the Human Homologue of the Arabidopsis COP9 Signalosome Subunit 7a and Olig1
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10571-015-0255-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiazhen Zhou, Yuanyuan Li, Cheng He

Abstract

The oligodendrocyte lineage gene (Olig1) was first identified in screens, and was shown to be a master regulator during differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursors into myelin forming oligodendrocytes. Olig1 was also shown to be required for myelin repair during multiple sclerosis. While co-regulator proteins for nuclear Olig1 are well established, co-regulator proteins for cytoplasmic Olig1 remain unknown. Using a yeast two-hybrid strategy, we found that Olig1 bound to a human homologue of the Arabidopsis COP9 signalosome subunit 7a (COPS7A). Moreover, the interaction between Olig1 and COPS7A was subsequently confirmed by both in vitro and in vivo co-immunoprecipitation assays and immunofluorescent staining. In particular, confocal laser microscopic images showed that Olig1 and COPS7A co-localized to the cytoplasm of oligodendrocytes in the adult rat corpus callosum. By contrast, COPS7A was consistently expressed in oligodendrocyte lineage cells, and was down-regulated during the peak period of myelination. Collectively, these findings suggested that COPS7A associated physically with Olig1, and it might thus serve as a novel negative regulator in oligodendrocytes differentiation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,382,519
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#177
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,844
of 270,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.