You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.106.174526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan T Hirsch, Ziv J Haskal, Norman R Hertzer, Curtis W Bakal, Mark A Creager, Jonathan L Halperin, Loren F Hiratzka, William R C Murphy, Jeffrey W Olin, Jules B Puschett, Kenneth A Rosenfield, David Sacks, James C Stanley, Lloyd M Taylor, Christopher J White, John White, Rodney A White, Elliott M Antman, Sidney C Smith, Cynthia D Adams, Jeffrey L Anderson, David P Faxon, Valentin Fuster, Raymond J Gibbons, Sharon A Hunt, Alice K Jacobs, Rick Nishimura, Joseph P Ornato, Richard L Page, Barbara Riegel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 796 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 779 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 13% |
| Researcher | 82 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 10% |
| Other | 78 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 68 | 9% |
| Other | 186 | 23% |
| Unknown | 196 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 415 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 3% |
| Engineering | 25 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 7% |
| Unknown | 226 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,138,921
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#2,793
of 19,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,771
of 66,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#15
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.