↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity of young people in the Torres Strait and Northern Peninsula Region: An exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Rural Health, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical activity of young people in the Torres Strait and Northern Peninsula Region: An exploratory study
Published in
Australian Journal of Rural Health, September 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.00979.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Abbott, David Jenkins, Melissa Haswell‐Elkins, Karla Fell, Doune MacDonald, Ester Cerin

Abstract

The present study explored the practices of, and perceived barriers to, physical activity of young people living in remote communities in the Torres Strait and Northern Peninsula Area of Far North Queensland. A cross-sectional survey exploring physical activity practices of children attending primary and secondary schools in two communities in the Torres Strait, Far North Queensland. A total of 367 primary and secondary school-aged children (aged 9-16 years). Only 50% of the children reported being active for more than 30 min a day and approximately 25% of both primary and high school children surveyed were 'pretty much active only at week-ends'. The major barriers cited to being active were related to the climate, lack of equipment and child-specific activities and low self-perception of ability. A large proportion of school students in the Torres Strait and Northern Peninsula Area reported low levels of physical activity. The main barriers cited to being active suggest that structural and family-based strategies are required to help young people, especially girls, to engage in more physical activity. There is also a need for skills and confidence-building activities delivered in a non-competitive environment for those who feel that they lack the necessary skills to participate fully.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 18%
Sports and Recreations 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2009.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#785
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,159
of 95,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.