↓ Skip to main content

The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, November 2011
DOI 10.3109/11038128.2011.627378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anette Kjellberg, Ida Kåhlin, Lena Haglund, Renée R. Taylor

Abstract

Participation is often the comprehensive objective of treatment but also an indication of the extent to which the process of occupational therapy is client-centred. The purpose of this study was to explore levels of participation during occupational therapy among clients in the area of mental health from the occupational therapists' perspectives. Additionally the authors sought to identify factors that might hinder client participation. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 670 Swedish occupational therapists working with persons with mental illness and learning disabilities. The questionnaire required therapists to rate clients' levels of participation during occupational therapy. Findings indicated that the most common level of participation for the clients was interdependent, meaning that problems, goals, and plans were identified jointly and collaboratively with the occupational therapist. However, more than 20% of the clients were described as being dependent. Almost 90% of the occupational therapists rated client participation in therapy to be very important and nearly 70% claimed that client participation in general needed to be increased. Occupational therapists rated the primary barriers to participation as being clients' inability to participate and organizational and financial problems. Implications of these findings for education in client-centred practice approaches are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Psychology 13 9%
Unspecified 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#12,850,437
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#201
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,047
of 141,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.