↓ Skip to main content

A validation of the pain interference index in adults with long‐standing pain

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A validation of the pain interference index in adults with long‐standing pain
Published in
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/aas.12599
Pubmed ID
Authors

M K Kemani, V Zetterqvist, M Kanstrup, L Holmström, R K Wicksell

Abstract

Chronic pain is a major health problem and more knowledge is needed regarding the interference of pain on behaviors in different life domains. Clinically useful and statistically sound pain interference measures are highly important. Studies on youths have shown that the Pain Interference Index (PII) is a reliable and valid instrument that is sensitive to change following behavioral treatment. This measure may also have utility for adults, but no study has so far evaluated the statistical properties of the PII for long-standing pain in adults. Data were collected from 239 consecutive adults with non-specific chronic pain referred to a tertiary pain clinic. We investigated the factor structure of items using a principal component analysis. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The questionnaire's ability to predict levels of, e.g., disability was analyzed by means of regression analyses. Analyses illustrated the adequacy of a one-factor solution with six items. Cronbach's alpha (0.85) suggested a satisfactory internal consistency among items. The PII explained significant amounts of variance in pain disability, physical, and mental health-related quality of life and depression, suggesting concurrent criteria validity. The PII is a brief questionnaire with reliable and valid statistical properties to assess pain interference in adults. Other studies support the reliability and validity of PII for use with youths, and now the PII can be used to analyze the influence of pain on behaviors across age groups. Potentially, the PII can also be used as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Psychology 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 37%