↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-6-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick A Guldemond, Pieter Leffers, Nicolaas C Schaper, Antal P Sanders, Fred HM Nieman, Geert HIM Walenkamp

Abstract

There is a need for evidence of clinical effectiveness of foot orthosis therapy. This study evaluated the effect of foot orthoses made by ten podiatrists, ten pedorthists and eleven orthotists on plantar pressure and walking convenience for three patients with metatarsalgia. Aims were to assess differences and variability between and within the disciplines. The relationship between the importance of pressure reduction and the effect on peak pressure was also evaluated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Engineering 8 10%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2011.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,016
of 4,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,888
of 156,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.