↓ Skip to main content

Trends in sources and sharing of needles among people who inject drugs, San Francisco, 2005–2012

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Drug Policy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in sources and sharing of needles among people who inject drugs, San Francisco, 2005–2012
Published in
International Journal of Drug Policy, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan J. Kim, Harry Jin, Willi McFarland, Henry F. Raymond

Abstract

Globally, people who inject drugs (PWID) are disproportionately at risk for HIV and HCV due to risky injection drug use behaviors, such as sharing used needles and injection kits. In response, San Francisco, one of several cities with a sizable PWID population that had quickly committed to stopping the spread of HIV/HCV, have expanded needle access, including in pharmacies and hospitals, in order to ensure that PWID inject with clean needles. However, there was no current research on whether each source of needles is equally associated with always using new sterile needles in San Francisco. Furthermore, no research in San Francisco had examined behavioral trends in needle-sharing practices, the relationship between PWID and their injection partners, and knowledge of their injection partners' HIV or HCV status. Therefore, we analyzed data from three cycles of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance studies from 2005 to 2012 in San Francisco among PWID. The results from our analysis suggest that overall risky drug injection practices, such as injecting with used needles, sharing used cookers or water, and dividing drugs with a used syringe, among PWID in San Francisco has decreased from 2005 to 2012. An increasing proportion of PWID are injecting with their friend/acquaintance than with their sex partner. Also, a declining portion of PWID report knowing their last injection partner's HIV-positive or HCV-positive status. In terms of sources of needles, less PWID are getting their needles from friends and drug dealers while a greater proportion are using pharmacies and needle exchanges. However, pharmacies as a source of needles are negatively associated with always using new sterile needles. From 2005 to 2012, overall high-risk injection behavior among PWID in SF has decreased including PWID that are injecting with others. However, our results suggest caution over the expansion of pharmacies as a source of needles in San Francisco and in similar cities due to their negative association with always using a new sterile needle. Since more PWID are injecting with their friend/acquaintance, interventions at needle access programs at pharmacies, hospitals, and needle exchanges should stress the potential to transmit HIV and HCV even in one-on-one sharing situations. Furthermore, since a decreasing percentage of PWID know about their injection partner's HIV/HCV status, such interventions should also highlight the importance of having a conversation about HIV and HCV status with one's injecting partner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Psychology 5 9%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Drug Policy
#2,318
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,076
of 277,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Drug Policy
#33
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.