↓ Skip to main content

A Review on Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in Biomedical Applications and Risks in Environment and Health

Overview of attention for article published in Nano-Micro Letters, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
Title
A Review on Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in Biomedical Applications and Risks in Environment and Health
Published in
Nano-Micro Letters, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40820-018-0206-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thabitha P. Dasari Shareena, Danielle McShan, Asok K. Dasmahapatra, Paul B. Tchounwou

Abstract

Graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) have attracted increasing interests of the scientific community due to their unique physicochemical properties and their applications in biotechnology, biomedicine, bioengineering, disease diagnosis and therapy. Although a large amount of researches have been conducted on these novel nanomaterials, limited comprehensive reviews are published on their biomedical applications and potential environmental and human health effects. The present research aimed at addressing this knowledge gap by examining and discussing: (1) the history, synthesis, structural properties and recent developments of GBNs for biomedical applications; (2) GBNs uses as therapeutics, drug/gene delivery and antibacterial materials; (3) GBNs applications in tissue engineering and in research as biosensors and bioimaging materials; and (4) GBNs potential environmental effects and human health risks. It also discussed the perspectives and challenges associated with the biomedical applications of GBNs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 514 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 17%
Student > Master 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 182 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 58 11%
Chemistry 54 11%
Materials Science 47 9%
Chemical Engineering 25 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 5%
Other 94 18%
Unknown 212 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,786,653
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#109
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,521
of 344,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.