Title |
Recovery after critical illness in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center prospective observational cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-4028-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daren K. Heyland, Allan Garland, Sean M. Bagshaw, Deborah Cook, Kenneth Rockwood, Henry T. Stelfox, Peter Dodek, Robert A. Fowler, Alexis F. Turgeon, Karen Burns, John Muscedere, Jim Kutsogiannis, Martin Albert, Sangeeta Mehta, Xuran Jiang, Andrew G. Day |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 30 | 33% |
Netherlands | 7 | 8% |
United States | 6 | 7% |
Japan | 3 | 3% |
Poland | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 1% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 61 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 21% |
Scientists | 8 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 237 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 27 | 11% |
Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
Researcher | 26 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
Other | 63 | 26% |
Unknown | 50 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Engineering | 3 | 1% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Unknown | 61 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#696,569
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#637
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,988
of 280,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.