You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of Retinoids in IKZF1-Mutated BCR-ABL1 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.07.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle L Churchman, Jonathan Low, Chunxu Qu, Elisabeth M Paietta, Lawryn H Kasper, Yunchao Chang, Debbie Payne-Turner, Mark J Althoff, Guangchun Song, Shann-Ching Chen, Jing Ma, Michael Rusch, Dan McGoldrick, Michael Edmonson, Pankaj Gupta, Yong-Dong Wang, William Caufield, Burgess Freeman, Lie Li, John C Panetta, Sharyn Baker, Yung-Li Yang, Kathryn G Roberts, Kelly McCastlain, Ilaria Iacobucci, Jennifer L Peters, Victoria E Centonze, Faiyaz Notta, Stephanie M Dobson, Sasan Zandi, John E Dick, Laura Janke, Junmin Peng, Kiran Kodali, Vishwajeeth Pagala, Jaeki Min, Anand Mayasundari, Richard T Williams, Cheryl L Willman, Jacob Rowe, Selina Luger, Ross A Dickins, R Kiplin Guy, Taosheng Chen, Charles G Mullighan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,350,756
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#1,991
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,540
of 281,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.