↓ Skip to main content

Ligand binding and conformational changes of SUR1 subunit in pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Ligand binding and conformational changes of SUR1 subunit in pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels
Published in
Protein & Cell, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13238-018-0530-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing-Xiang Wu, Dian Ding, Mengmeng Wang, Yunlu Kang, Xin Zeng, Lei Chen

Abstract

ATP-sensitive potassium channels (KATP) are energy sensors on the plasma membrane. By sensing the intracellular ADP/ATP ratio of β-cells, pancreatic KATP channels control insulin release and regulate metabolism at the whole body level. They are implicated in many metabolic disorders and diseases and are therefore important drug targets. Here, we present three structures of pancreatic KATP channels solved by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), at resolutions ranging from 4.1 to 4.5 Å. These structures depict the binding site of the antidiabetic drug glibenclamide, indicate how Kir6.2 (inward-rectifying potassium channel 6.2) N-terminus participates in the coupling between the peripheral SUR1 (sulfonylurea receptor 1) subunit and the central Kir6.2 channel, reveal the binding mode of activating nucleotides, and suggest the mechanism of how Mg-ADP binding on nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) drives a conformational change of the SUR1 subunit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,038,848
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#78
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,516
of 335,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.