↓ Skip to main content

Timetable for oral prevention in childhood—a current opinion

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 255)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Timetable for oral prevention in childhood—a current opinion
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40510-015-0098-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paddy Fleming

Abstract

Dental caries in young children remains a public health problem particularly for children whose families are socioeconomically deprived. A child's first dental visit should be at approximately 12 months of age and this should facilitate the provision of anticipatory guidance concerning oral health and dental development to the child's parents/guardians. Compliance with dietary advice is of key importance and motivational interviewing shows promise in relation to parents adopting good oral health practices for their children. Twice daily toothbrushing using toothpaste that contains in the range of 1000- 1500ppmF is a most important preventive measure. It is important to use a minimal amount of toothpaste, insure that it is not swallowed, have parental or adult supervision during toothbrushing and avoid rinsing with water following brushing with toothpaste. The professional application of topical fluoride varnish twice yearly is a proven caries preventative measure. The application of pit and fissure sealants to teeth with deep pits and fissures is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 42 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#47
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,500
of 279,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them