↓ Skip to main content

Improved propagation methods to raise the productivity of yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.)

Overview of attention for article published in Food Security, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Improved propagation methods to raise the productivity of yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.)
Published in
Food Security, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0481-6
Authors

B. A. Aighewi, R. Asiedu, N. Maroya, M. Balogun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 54 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 40%
Engineering 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 59 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Food Security
#629
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,893
of 264,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Security
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.