↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and Reducing False Alarms in Observational Fog Prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Boundary-Layer Meteorology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 741)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Understanding and Reducing False Alarms in Observational Fog Prediction
Published in
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10546-018-0374-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan G. Izett, Bas J. H. van de Wiel, Peter Baas, Fred C. Bosveld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 39%
Student > Master 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 22%
Engineering 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,795,490
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#45
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,014
of 328,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.