| Title |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Crystian B. Oliveira, Chris G. Maher, Rafael Z. Pinto, Adrian C. Traeger, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Jean-François Chenot, Maurits van Tulder, Bart W. Koes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 15% |
| Australia | 11 | 8% |
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 73% |
| Scientists | 22 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,930 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1928 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 272 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 262 | 14% |
| Other | 125 | 6% |
| Researcher | 119 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 99 | 5% |
| Other | 353 | 18% |
| Unknown | 700 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 439 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 375 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 98 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 49 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 34 | 2% |
| Other | 175 | 9% |
| Unknown | 760 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#146,304
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#8
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,045
of 344,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.