↓ Skip to main content

A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2308 Mendeley
citeulike
85 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics
Published in
Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2008
DOI 10.1128/mmbr.00009-08
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Kunin, Alex Copeland, Alla Lapidus, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

As random shotgun metagenomic projects proliferate and become the dominant source of publicly available sequence data, procedures for the best practices in their execution and analysis become increasingly important. Based on our experience at the Joint Genome Institute, we describe the chain of decisions accompanying a metagenomic project from the viewpoint of the bioinformatic analysis step by step. We guide the reader through a standard workflow for a metagenomic project beginning with presequencing considerations such as community composition and sequence data type that will greatly influence downstream analyses. We proceed with recommendations for sampling and data generation including sample and metadata collection, community profiling, construction of shotgun libraries, and sequencing strategies. We then discuss the application of generic sequence processing steps (read preprocessing, assembly, and gene prediction and annotation) to metagenomic data sets in contrast to genome projects. Different types of data analyses particular to metagenomes are then presented, including binning, dominant population analysis, and gene-centric analysis. Finally, data management issues are presented and discussed. We hope that this review will assist bioinformaticians and biologists in making better-informed decisions on their journey during a metagenomic project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 74 3%
Brazil 34 1%
United Kingdom 21 <1%
Germany 15 <1%
Spain 10 <1%
India 10 <1%
Denmark 8 <1%
Italy 7 <1%
France 7 <1%
Other 90 4%
Unknown 2032 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 577 25%
Researcher 527 23%
Student > Master 339 15%
Student > Bachelor 200 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 115 5%
Other 351 15%
Unknown 199 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1179 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 323 14%
Environmental Science 132 6%
Computer Science 117 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 74 3%
Other 221 10%
Unknown 262 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,147,486
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews
#378
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,624
of 182,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.