| Title |
A Biomimetic Spermatozoa Propulsion Method for Interventional Micro Robot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bionic Engineering, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1672-6529(08)60080-3 |
| Authors |
Bai Chen, Yao-dong Liu, Sun Chen, Su-rong Jiang, Hong-tao Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 63% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,829,891
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#30
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,625
of 80,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them