↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic intact removal of medium-size- or multiple bladder stones with the use of transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Endoscopic intact removal of medium-size- or multiple bladder stones with the use of transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
Published in
World Journal of Urology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2358-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marek Roslan, Maciej Przudzik, Michał Borowik

Abstract

To determine the feasibility and safety of performing transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (T-LESS) in patients with medium-size, hard stones or multiple stones with high burden. In this case series study, 12 patients (11 males and one female) with a mean age of 66.8 years were operated on from February 2016 to May 2017 due to bladder calculi, using the T-LESS approach with a single-port device (Tri-Port + , Olympus, Germany). Indications for this procedure were hard, medium-size, solitary stones after previous unsuccessful endoscopic lithotripsy or the presence of multiple high-burden stones. In two patients, additional procedures (diverticulectomy or a ureterocele incision) were performed simultaneously. All stones were removed intact. No serious complications were observed. The mean operative time was 46 min and the postoperative hospital stay was 22 h. The mean diameter of the largest stone and the mean stone volume of each case were 24 mm and 11 cm3, respectively. At the mean follow-up time of 15 months, there was significant improvement of the symptoms. The T-LESS technique is an efficient, safe and minimally invasive procedure for intact bladder stone removal in selected patients. The method avoids the risk of urethral injury. Nevertheless, further investigation is needed to assess the wider applicability of the procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,103,417
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,232
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,720
of 329,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#34
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.