↓ Skip to main content

Moral hierarchies within autism parenting: Making parent-therapists and perpetuating disparities within contemporary China

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Moral hierarchies within autism parenting: Making parent-therapists and perpetuating disparities within contemporary China
Published in
BioSocieties, June 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41292-018-0123-2
Authors

Emily Xi Lin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 18%
Social Sciences 5 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,327,849
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#176
of 395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,016
of 328,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.