↓ Skip to main content

A decade of metaproteomics: Where we stand and what the future holds

Overview of attention for article published in PROTEOMICS, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A decade of metaproteomics: Where we stand and what the future holds
Published in
PROTEOMICS, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/pmic.201500183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Wilmes, Anna Heintz‐Buschart, Philip L. Bond

Abstract

We are living through exciting times during which we are able to unravel the "microbial dark matter" in and around us through the application of high-resolution "meta-omics". Metaproteomics offers the ability to resolve the major catalytic units of microbial populations and thereby allows the establishment of genotype-phenotype linkages from in situ samples. A decade has passed since the term "metaproteomics" was first coined and corresponding analyses were carried out on mixed microbial communities. Metaproteomics has yielded many important insights into microbial ecosystem function in the various environmental settings where it has been applied. Although initial progress in analytical capacities and resulting numbers of proteins identified was extremely fast, this trend slowed rapidly. Here we highlight several representative metaproteomic investigations of activated sludge, acid mine drainage biofilms, freshwater and seawater microbial communities, soil, and human gut microbiota. By using these case studies, we highlight current challenges and possible solutions for metaproteomics to realize its full potential, i.e. to enable conclusive links between microbial community composition, physiology, function, interactions, ecology, and evolution. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 24%
Researcher 56 20%
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 19%
Environmental Science 28 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 56 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,769,917
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PROTEOMICS
#52
of 4,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,196
of 282,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROTEOMICS
#4
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.