You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential coral bleaching—Contrasting the activity and response of enzymatic antioxidants in symbiotic partners under thermal stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.08.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Krueger, Thomas D. Hawkins, Susanne Becker, Stefanie Pontasch, Sophie Dove, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, William Leggat, Paul L. Fisher, Simon K. Davy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 220 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
#1,294
of 1,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,233
of 281,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.