↓ Skip to main content

A Linear Mixed Model Spline Framework for Analysing Time Course ‘Omics’ Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Linear Mixed Model Spline Framework for Analysing Time Course ‘Omics’ Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0134540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasmin Straube, Alain-Dominique Gorse, Bevan Emma Huang, Kim-Anh Lê Cao

Abstract

Time course 'omics' experiments are becoming increasingly important to study system-wide dynamic regulation. Despite their high information content, analysis remains challenging. 'Omics' technologies capture quantitative measurements on tens of thousands of molecules. Therefore, in a time course 'omics' experiment molecules are measured for multiple subjects over multiple time points. This results in a large, high-dimensional dataset, which requires computationally efficient approaches for statistical analysis. Moreover, methods need to be able to handle missing values and various levels of noise. We present a novel, robust and powerful framework to analyze time course 'omics' data that consists of three stages: quality assessment and filtering, profile modelling, and analysis. The first step consists of removing molecules for which expression or abundance is highly variable over time. The second step models each molecular expression profile in a linear mixed model framework which takes into account subject-specific variability. The best model is selected through a serial model selection approach and results in dimension reduction of the time course data. The final step includes two types of analysis of the modelled trajectories, namely, clustering analysis to identify groups of correlated profiles over time, and differential expression analysis to identify profiles which differ over time and/or between treatment groups. Through simulation studies we demonstrate the high sensitivity and specificity of our approach for differential expression analysis. We then illustrate how our framework can bring novel insights on two time course 'omics' studies in breast cancer and kidney rejection. The methods are publicly available, implemented in the R CRAN package lmms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Engineering 7 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,368,841
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,658
of 199,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,909
of 268,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,810
of 6,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.