↓ Skip to main content

Bowel obstruction complicated by ischemia: analysis of CT findings

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Bowel obstruction complicated by ischemia: analysis of CT findings
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00261-018-1651-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica L. Cox, Ali M. Tahvildari, Benjamin Johnson, Wei Wei, R. Brooke Jeffrey

Abstract

To analyze CT signs of bowel ischemia in patients with surgical bowel obstruction, and thereby improve CT diagnosis in this common clinical scenario. Surgical and histopathological findings were used as the reference standard. We retrospectively analyzed CT findings in patients brought to surgery for bowel obstruction over 13 years. Etiology of obstruction (adhesion, hernia, etc.) was recorded. Specific CT features of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) were analyzed, including bowel wall thickening, mucosal hypoenhancement, and others. 173 cases were eligible for analysis. 21% of cases were positive for bowel ischemia. Volvulus, internal hernia, and closed-loop obstructions showed ischemia rates of 60%, 43%, and 43%; ischemia rate in obstruction from simple adhesion was 21%. Patients with bowel obstruction related to malignancy were never ischemic. Sensitivities and specificities for CT features predicting ischemia were calculated, with wall thickening, hypoenhancement, and pneumatosis showing high specificity for ischemia (86%-100%). Wall thickening, hypoenhancement, and pneumatosis are highly specific CT signs of ischemia in the setting of obstruction. None of the evaluated CT signs were found to be highly sensitive. Overall frequency of ischemia in surgical bowel obstruction is 21%, and 2-3 times that for complex obstructions (volvulus, closed loop, etc.). Obstructions related to malignancy virtually never become ischemic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%