You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dense genotyping identifies and localizes multiple common and rare variant association signals in celiac disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.998 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gosia Trynka, Karen A Hunt, Nicholas A Bockett, Jihane Romanos, Vanisha Mistry, Agata Szperl, Sjoerd F Bakker, Maria Teresa Bardella, Leena Bhaw-Rosun, Gemma Castillejo, Emilio G de la Concha, Rodrigo Coutinho de Almeida, Kerith-Rae M Dias, Cleo C van Diemen, Patrick C A Dubois, Richard H Duerr, Sarah Edkins, Lude Franke, Karin Fransen, Javier Gutierrez, Graham A R Heap, Barbara Hrdlickova, Sarah Hunt, Leticia Plaza Izurieta, Valentina Izzo, Leo A B Joosten, Cordelia Langford, Maria Cristina Mazzilli, Charles A Mein, Vandana Midah, Mitja Mitrovic, Barbara Mora, Marinita Morelli, Sarah Nutland, Concepción Núñez, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Kerra Pearce, Mathieu Platteel, Isabel Polanco, Simon Potter, Carmen Ribes-Koninckx, Isis Ricaño-Ponce, Stephen S Rich, Anna Rybak, José Luis Santiago, Sabyasachi Senapati, Ajit Sood, Hania Szajewska, Riccardo Troncone, Jezabel Varadé, Chris Wallace, Victorien M Wolters, Alexandra Zhernakova, B K Thelma, Bozena Cukrowska, Elena Urcelay, Jose Ramon Bilbao, M Luisa Mearin, Donatella Barisani, Jeffrey C Barrett, Vincent Plagnol, Panos Deloukas, Cisca Wijmenga, David A van Heel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 29% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 539 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 514 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 130 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 84 | 16% |
| Unknown | 78 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 105 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,894,961
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,436
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,414
of 157,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#38
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.