↓ Skip to main content

Powerful Solar Flares in September 2017. Comparison with the Largest Flares in Cycle 24

Overview of attention for article published in Astrophysics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 140)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Powerful Solar Flares in September 2017. Comparison with the Largest Flares in Cycle 24
Published in
Astrophysics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10511-018-9531-z
Authors

E. A. Bruevich, V. V. Bruevich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,082,149
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Astrophysics
#5
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,817
of 330,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrophysics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them