↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Extreme Heat Events on Emergency Department Visits in North Carolina (2007–2011)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Extreme Heat Events on Emergency Department Visits in North Carolina (2007–2011)
Published in
Journal of Community Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10900-015-0080-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Fuhrmann, Margaret M. Sugg, Charles E. Konrad, Anna Waller

Abstract

Extreme heat is the leading cause of w eather-related mortality in the U.S. Extreme heat also affects human health through heat stress and can exacerbate underlying medical conditions that lead to increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, data on emergency department (ED) visits for heat-related illness (HRI) and other selected diseases were analyzed during three heat events across North Carolina from 2007 to 2011. These heat events were identified based on the issuance and verification of heat products from local National Weather Service forecast offices (i.e. Heat Advisory, Heat Watch, and Excessive Heat Warning). The observed number of ED visits during these events were compared to the expected number of ED visits during several control periods to determine excess morbidity resulting from extreme heat. All recorded diagnoses were analyzed for each ED visit, thereby providing insight into the specific pathophysiological mechanisms and underlying health conditions associated with exposure to extreme heat. The most common form of HRI was heat exhaustion, while the percentage of visits with heat stroke was relatively low (<10 %). The elderly (>65 years of age) were at greatest risk for HRI during the early summer heat event (8.9 visits per 100,000), while young and middle age adults (18-44 years of age) were at greatest risk during the mid-summer event (6.3 visits per 100,000). Many of these visits were likely due to work-related exposure. The most vulnerable demographic during the late summer heat event was adolescents (15-17 years of age), which may relate to the timing of organized sports. This demographic also exhibited the highest visit rate for HRI among all three heat events (10.5 visits per 100,000). Significant increases (p < 0.05) in visits with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were noted during the three heat events (3-8 %). The greatest increases were found in visits with hypotension during the late summer event (23 %) and sequelae during the early summer event (30 %), while decreases were noted for visits with hemorrhagic stroke during the middle and late summer events (13-24 %) and for visits with aneurysm during the early summer event (15 %). Significant increases were also noted in visits with respiratory diseases (5-7 %). The greatest increases in this category were found in visits with pneumonia and influenza (16 %), bronchitis and emphysema (12 %), and COPD (14 %) during the early summer event. Significant increases in visits with nervous system disorders were also found during the early summer event (16 %), while increases in visits with diabetes were noted during the mid-summer event (10 %).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 43 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,157,458
of 23,485,953 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#137
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,499
of 267,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.