↓ Skip to main content

1980年代以前のニホンヤマビルの分布

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 119)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
78 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1980年代以前のニホンヤマビルの分布
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, April 2018
DOI 10.4005/jjfs.100.65
Authors

逢沢 峰昭, 森嶋 佳織

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#827,998
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#4
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,440
of 346,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them