| Title |
Rice ecosystem services in South-east Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Paddy and Water Environment, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10333-018-0656-9 |
| Authors |
Josef Settele, Kong Luen Heong, Ingolf Kühn, Stefan Klotz, Joachim H. Spangenberg, Gertrudo Arida, Alexis Beaurepaire, Silke Beck, Erwin Bergmeier, Benjamin Burkhard, Roland Brandl, Jesus Victor Bustamante, Adam Butler, Jimmy Cabbigat, Xuan Canh Le, Josie Lynn A. Catindig, Van Chien Ho, Quoc Cuong Le, Kinh Bac Dang, Monina Escalada, Christophe Dominik, Markus Franzén, Oliver Fried, Christoph Görg, Volker Grescho, Sabine Grossmann, Geoff M. Gurr, Buyung A. R. Hadi, Huu Hai Le, Alexander Harpke, Annika L. Hass, Norbert Hirneisen, Finbarr G. Horgan, Stefan Hotes, Yuzuru Isoda, Reinhold Jahn, Helen Kettle, Anika Klotzbücher, Thimo Klotzbücher, Fanny Langerwisch, Wai-Hong Loke, Yu-Pin Lin, Zhongxian Lu, Keng-Yeang Lum, Damasa B. Magcale-Macandog, Glenn Marion, Leonardo Marquez, Felix Müller, Hung Manh Nguyen, Quynh Anh Nguyen, Van Sinh Nguyen, Jürgen Ott, Lyubomir Penev, Hong Thai Pham, Nico Radermacher, Beatriz Rodriguez-Labajos, Christina Sann, Cornelia Sattler, Martin Schädler, Stefan Scheu, Anja Schmidt, Julian Schrader, Oliver Schweiger, Ralf Seppelt, Kukiat Soitong, Pavel Stoev, Susanne Stoll-Kleemann, Vera Tekken, Kirsten Thonicke, Bianca Tilliger, Kai Tobias, Y. Andi Trisyono, Thanh Truong Dao, Teja Tscharntke, Quang Tuan Le, Manfred Türke, Tomáš Václavík, Doris Vetterlein, Sylvia ’Bong’ Villareal, Kim Chi Vu, Quynh Vu, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Catrin Westphal, Zengrong Zhu, Martin Wiemers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,669,730
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Paddy and Water Environment
#8
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,125
of 341,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paddy and Water Environment
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.