↓ Skip to main content

Innovations in science and scenarios for assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Innovations in science and scenarios for assessment
Published in
Climatic Change, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1494-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth E. Kunkel, Richard Moss, Adam Parris

Abstract

Scenarios for the Third National Climate Assessment (NCA3) were produced for physical climate and sea level rise with substantial input from disciplinary and regional experts. These scenarios underwent extensive review and were published as NOAA Technical Reports. For land use/cover and socioeconomic conditions, scenarios already developed by other agencies were specified for use in the NCA3. Efforts to enhance participatory scenario planning as an assessment activity were pursued, but with limited success. Issues and challenges included the timing of availability of scenarios, the need for guidance in use of scenarios, the need for approaches to nest information within multiple scales and sectors, engagement and collaboration of end users in scenario development, and development of integrated scenarios. Future assessments would benefit from an earlier start to scenarios development, the provision of training in addition to guidance documents, new and flexible approaches for nesting information, ongoing engagement and advice from both scientific and end user communities, and the development of consistent and integrated scenarios.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 8%
Estonia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 40%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 25%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,344
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,663
of 266,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#47
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.