↓ Skip to main content

The Big Picture: Storytelling Ability in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
The Big Picture: Storytelling Ability in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1388-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Barnes, Simon Baron-Cohen

Abstract

Previous work on story-telling ability in autism spectrum conditions (ASC) has found a pattern of relatively intact use of story grammar in ASC narratives; however, prior analysis has concentrated primarily on whether specific story components are included, rather than how they are included. The present study analyzes an existing narrative dataset, concentrating on the kind of information that individuals with and without high functioning autism or Asperger syndrome include about story elements such as setting, character, conflict, and resolution. This analysis showed that individuals with ASC are biased toward providing local over global details about each element, regardless of whether the element involved mental content. These results are discussed in terms of the Weak Central Coherence and Hyper-Systemizing theories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 34%
Social Sciences 19 14%
Linguistics 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,861
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,816
of 144,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.