↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of community pharmacists advising pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Experiences of community pharmacists advising pregnant women
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11096-015-0111-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Švitrigailė Grincevičienė, Loreta Kubilienė, Kostas Ivanauskas, Gražina S. Drąsutienė, Diana Ramašauskaitė, Jonas Grincevičius, Jurga Bernatonienė, Arūnas Savickas

Abstract

Background Recent studies have shown that pharmacists provide healthcare advice to pregnant women, and that they can play an important role in maternal care. However, pharmacists have faced challenges in advising mothers and coordinating with physicians. Objective To explore the experiences of community pharmacists in advising pregnant women at Lithuanian community pharmacies. Setting Community pharmacies in Lithuania. Methods Community pharmacists (n = 27) were recruited for semistructured face-to-face interviews from June 2012 to March 2013. A qualitative and descriptive study based on the content analysis approach was used for data collection and analysis. Main outcome measure Thematic coding of Lithuanian community pharmacist interview content. Results Three main areas emerged: topics of advice-giving, provision of information, and barriers to advice-giving. The question of whether to interact with the physician connected to all of these areas. Pharmacists described different practices about the advice they gave and how they gave it. Lack of knowledge and skills, both about pregnancy and about patient-physician-pharmacist interaction, were a clear barrier to care for pregnant women in community pharmacies. Conclusion Respondents were comfortable giving advice in clear situations, and found it challenging to do so otherwise. Improving the physician-pharmacist-patient communication environment and providing education and training programmes for pharmacists is necessary to reduce stress and to overcome barriers in advising pregnant women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1,011
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,203
of 264,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.