↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated with Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
445 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Associated with Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharmila Vaz, Nathan Wilson, Marita Falkmer, Angela Sim, Melissa Scott, Reinie Cordier, Torbjörn Falkmer

Abstract

Teachers' attitudes toward inclusion are often based on the practical implementation of inclusive education rather than a specific ideology and understanding of inclusiveness. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with primary school teachers' attitudes towards inclusion of students with all disabilities in regular schools. Seventy four primary school teachers participated in a cross-sectional survey conducted in Western Australia. Teachers' attitudes and efficacy toward integration of students with disabilities were measured using the Opinions Relative to Integration of Students with Disabilities scale and Bandura's Teacher Efficacy scale respectively. Four teacher attributes-age, gender, teaching self-efficacy and training collectively explained 42% of the variability in teachers' attitude toward including students with disabilities. The current study further contributes to the accumulation of knowledge that can unpack the complex pattern of factors that should be considered to promote positive attitudes towards inclusive schools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 444 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 9%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 120 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 120 27%
Psychology 69 16%
Arts and Humanities 37 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 3%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 129 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,362,543
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,814
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,311
of 280,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#737
of 5,983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.