↓ Skip to main content

LRRC3B is downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer and inhibits cancer cell proliferation and invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
LRRC3B is downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer and inhibits cancer cell proliferation and invasion
Published in
Tumor Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3833-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Kan, Hui Li, Yi Zhang, Jiahe Wang, Huiyan Niu, Hongfang Jiang, Meng Zhang, Xue Bai, Ping He

Abstract

LRRC3B has emerged as a tumor suppressor in several human cancers. However, its expression pattern and biological roles in human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been explored. In the present study, we investigated clinical significance of LRRC3B in 101 NSCLC specimens. We found that LRRC3B expression was downregulated in NSCLC tissues compared with normal bronchial epithelium and that its downregulation significantly correlated with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (p < 0.0001), nodal metastasis (p < 0.0001), and poor patient prognosis (p = 0.0016, log-rank test). We also checked LRRC3B levels in several lung cancer cell lines and found that its expression was downregulated in four of nine lung cancer cell lines compared with normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cell line. We further explored the biological role of LRRC3B. LRRC3B plasmid transfection in H460 and A549 cell lines inhibited proliferation, colony formation ability, and invading ability. Furthermore, we identified that LRRC3B could inhibit cell cycle progression with downregulation of cyclin D1 and decreased MMP9 expression. In addition, LRRC3B depletion in HBE cells promoted proliferation and invasion. In conclusion, our data suggested that LRRC3B may serve as an important tumor suppressor in NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Energy 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,050
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,582
of 263,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#53
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.