↓ Skip to main content

Survey of enterovirus infections from hand, foot and mouth disease outbreak in china, 2009

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Survey of enterovirus infections from hand, foot and mouth disease outbreak in china, 2009
Published in
Virology Journal, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-8-508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Yang, Ting Zhang, Yongfeng Hu, Xiaofang Wang, Jiang Du, Yufen Li, Shaoxia Sun, Xiuhua Sun, Zhifang Li, Qi Jin

Abstract

In China, a rapid expansion of Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) outbreaks has occurred since 2004 and HFMD has become an important issue for China. However, people are still only concerned with human enterovirus 71(HEV-71) and coxsackie virus A16 (CV-A16). Much of what is known about the other enterovirus infections relies on fractional evidence and old epidemic data, with little knowledge concerning their distribution. To alert potential threatens of the other enteroviruses, our study genetically characterized specimens from different regions of China and yielded novel information concerning the circulating and phylogenetic characteristics of enteroviral strains from HFMD cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,349
of 3,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,374
of 141,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#34
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.