You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparisons of Quality Ratings for Music by Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e31803150cb |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie Looi, Hugh McDermott, Colette McKay, Louise Hickson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Engineering | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 29% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,926,429
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,146
of 2,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,297
of 94,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.