↓ Skip to main content

Is a Clean Development Mechanism project economically justified? Case study of an International Carbon Sequestration Project in Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Is a Clean Development Mechanism project economically justified? Case study of an International Carbon Sequestration Project in Iran
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-5256-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salih Katircioglu, Sara Dalir, Hossein G. Olya

Abstract

The present study evaluates a carbon sequestration project for the three plant species in arid and semiarid regions of Iran. Results show that Haloxylon performed appropriately in the carbon sequestration process during the 6 years of the International Carbon Sequestration Project (ICSP). In addition to a high degree of carbon dioxide sequestration, Haloxylon shows high compatibility with severe environmental conditions and low maintenance costs. Financial and economic analysis demonstrated that the ICSP was justified from an economic perspective. The financial assessment showed that net present value (NPV) (US$1,098,022.70), internal rate of return (IRR) (21.53 %), and payback period (6 years) were in an acceptable range. The results of the economic analysis suggested an NPV of US$4,407,805.15 and an IRR of 50.63 %. Therefore, results of this study suggest that there are sufficient incentives for investors to participate in such kind of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 17%
Engineering 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,223,569
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#2,737
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,741
of 270,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#47
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.