↓ Skip to main content

Regional variability in dust‐on‐snow processes and impacts in the Upper Colorado River Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Processes, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,043)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional variability in dust‐on‐snow processes and impacts in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Published in
Hydrological Processes, July 2015
DOI 10.1002/hyp.10569
Authors

S. McKenzie Skiles, Thomas H. Painter, Jayne Belnap, Lacey Holland, Richard L. Reynolds, Harland L. Goldstein, John Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 38%
Environmental Science 11 15%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#306,798
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#5
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,239
of 267,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.