↓ Skip to main content

Review of earlier evidence on dietary glycemic index and load and depression needs further attention

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Review of earlier evidence on dietary glycemic index and load and depression needs further attention
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1765-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asma Salari-Moghaddam, Bagher Larijani, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,737
of 2,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,182
of 329,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#52
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.