↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of thiopurines and adalimumab in preventing Crohn's disease recurrence in high‐risk patients – a POCER study analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of thiopurines and adalimumab in preventing Crohn's disease recurrence in high‐risk patients – a POCER study analysis
Published in
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/apt.13353
Pubmed ID
Authors

P De Cruz, M A Kamm, A L Hamilton, K J Ritchie, E O Krejany, A Gorelik, D Liew, L Prideaux, I C Lawrance, J M Andrews, P A Bampton, S Jakobovits, T H Florin, P R Gibson, H Debinski, R B Gearry, F A Macrae, R W Leong, I Kronborg, G Radford-Smith, W Selby, M J Johnston, R Woods, P R Elliott, S J Bell, S J Brown, W R Connell, P V Desmond

Abstract

Crohn's disease recurs in the majority of patients after intestinal resection. To compare the relative efficacy of thiopurines and anti-TNF therapy in patients at high risk of disease recurrence. As part of a larger study comparing post-operative management strategies, patients at high risk of recurrence (smoker, perforating disease, ≥2nd operation) were treated after resection of all macroscopic disease with 3 months metronidazole together with either azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day or mercaptopurine 1.5 mg/kg/day. Thiopurine-intolerant patients received adalimumab induction then 40 mg fortnightly. Patients underwent colonoscopy at 6 months with endoscopic recurrence assessed blind to treatment. A total of 101 patients [50% male; median (IQR) age 36 (25-46) years] were included. There were no differences in disease history between thiopurine- and adalimumab-treated patients. Fifteen patients withdrew prior to 6 months, five due to symptom recurrence (of whom four were colonoscoped). Endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score i2-i4) occurred in 33 of 73 (45%) thiopurine vs. 6 of 28 (21%) adalimumab-treated patients [intention-to-treat (ITT); P = 0.028] or 24 of 62 (39%) vs. 3 of 24 (13%) respectively [per-protocol analysis (PPA); P = 0.020]. Complete mucosal endoscopic normality (Rutgeerts i0) occurred in 17/73 (23%) vs. 15/28 (54%) (ITT; P = 0.003) and in 27% vs. 63% (PPA; P = 0.002). The most advanced disease (Rutgeerts i3 and i4) occurred in 8% vs. 4% (thiopurine vs. adalimumab). In Crohn's disease patients at high risk of post-operative recurrence adalimumab is superior to thiopurines in preventing early disease recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 40 27%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 59%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,696,310
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#862
of 5,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,389
of 283,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#14
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.