| Title |
Is the native ACL insertion site “completely restored” using an individualized approach to single‐bundle ACL‐R?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-014-3043-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. K. Middleton, B. Muller, P. H. Araujo, Y. Fujimaki, S. J. Rabuck, J. J. Irrgang, S. Tashman, F. H. Fu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,437
of 2,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,100
of 227,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#57
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.