↓ Skip to main content

Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11095-018-2439-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander L. Perryman, Jimmy S. Patel, Riccardo Russo, Eric Singleton, Nancy Connell, Sean Ekins, Joel S. Freundlich

Abstract

To advance translational research of potential therapeutic small molecules against infectious microbes, the compounds must display a relative lack of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Vero cell cytotoxicity (CC50) is a common initial assay for this metric. We explored the development of naïve Bayesian models that can enhance the probability of identifying non-cytotoxic compounds. Vero cell cytotoxicity assays were identified in PubChem, reformatted, and curated to create a training set with 8741 unique small molecules. These data were used to develop Bayesian classifiers, which were assessed with internal cross-validation, external tests with a set of 193 compounds from our laboratory, and independent validation with an additional diverse set of 1609 unique compounds from PubChem. Evaluation with independent, external test and validation sets indicated that cytotoxicity Bayesian models constructed with the ECFP_6 descriptor were more accurate than those that used FCFP_6 fingerprints. The best cytotoxicity Bayesian model displayed predictive power in external evaluations, according to conventional and chance-corrected statistics, as well as enrichment factors. The results from external tests demonstrate that our novel cytotoxicity Bayesian model displays sufficient predictive power to help guide translational research. To assist the chemical tool and drug discovery communities, our curated training set is being distributed as part of the Supplementary Material. Graphical Abstract Naive Bayesian models have been trained with publically available data and offer a useful tool for chemical biology and drug discovery to select for small molecules with a high probability of exhibiting acceptably low Vero cell cytotoxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Chemistry 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,492
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,373
of 329,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.