| Title |
Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00253-014-5819-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Héctor Martínez Ávila, Silke Schwarz, Eva-Maria Feldmann, Athanasios Mantas, Achim von Bomhard, Paul Gatenholm, Nicole Rotter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 19% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,545,582
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#535
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,845
of 230,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.