↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00259-018-4068-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W. Ives, Wael A. AlJaroudi, Vineeta Kumar, Ayman Farag, Dana V. Rizk, Suzanne Oparil, Ami E. Iskandrian, Fadi G. Hage

Abstract

Noninvasive stress testing is commonly performed as part of pre-renal transplantation (RT) evaluation. We evaluated the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-myocardial perfusion, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart rate response (HRR)-post-RT. Consecutive RT recipients were identified at our institution. MPI was considered abnormal when there was a perfusion defect or reduced ejection fraction. HRR to vasodilator stress was calculated as percentage change from baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) post-RT; all-cause mortality was the secondary endpoint. Among 1189 RT recipients, 819 (69%) underwent MPI. Of those, 182 (22%) had abnormal MPI, and 31 (4%) underwent CR pre-RT. During a median follow-up of 56 months post-RT, the annual CV event and mortality rates for patients who had no MPI, normal MPI and abnormal MPI were 1.5%, 3.1% and 4.3% (p < 0.001), and 1.8%, 2.6% and 3.6% (p = 0.016), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, compared to patients without MPI, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CV events for normal and abnormal MPI were 1.47 ([0.93-2.33], p = 0.1) and 1.78 ([1.03-3.06], p = 0.04). Blunted HRR was an independent predictor of CV events (HR = 1.73 [1.04-2.86], p = 0.034) and all-cause death (HR = 2.26 [1.28-3.98], p = 0.005) after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR pre-RT had annual mortality rates similar to those with no or normal MPI (1.9% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.2), while those who did not undergo CR had higher annual mortality (4% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.003). One in five RT recipients who underwent screening MPI had an abnormal study, an independent predictor of CV events. A blunted HRR to vasodilator stress was associated with increased risk of CV events and death, even after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR were at low risk of mortality following RT. MPI is a useful tool to aid in risk stratification pre-RT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#19,214,418
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,305
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,911
of 330,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.