Title |
Reductions in tree performance during hotter droughts are mitigated by shifts in nitrogen cycling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant, Cell & Environment, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1111/pce.13389 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlotte Grossiord, Arthur Gessler, Sasha C. Reed, Isaac Borrego, Adam D. Collins, Lee T. Dickman, Max Ryan, Leonie Schönbeck, Sanna Sevanto, Alberto Vilagrosa, Nate G. McDowell |
Abstract |
Climate warming should result in hotter droughts of unprecedented severity in this century. Such droughts have been linked with massive tree mortality and data suggest warming interacts with drought to aggravate plant performance. Yet, how forests will respond to hotter droughts remains unclear, as does the suite of mechanisms trees use to deal with hot droughts. We used an ecosystem-scale manipulation of precipitation and temperature on piñon pine (Pinus edulis) and juniper (Juniperus monosperma) trees to investigate nitrogen (N) cycling-induced mitigation processes related to hotter droughts. We found that while negative impacts on plant carbon and water balance are manifest after prolonged drought, performance reductions were not amplified by warmer temperatures. Rather, increased temperatures for five years stimulated soil N cycling under piñon trees and modified tree N allocation for both species, resulting in mitigation of hotter drought impacts on tree water and carbon functions. These findings suggest that adjustments in N cycling are likely after multi-year warming conditions and that such changes may buffer reductions in tree performance during hotter droughts. The results highlight our incomplete understanding of trees' ability to acclimate to climate change, raising fundamental questions about the resistance potential of forests to long-term, compound climatic stresses. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Finland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 50% |
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 23% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |