↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical, structural and biological characterisation of a new silk fibroin scaffold for meniscal repair

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanical, structural and biological characterisation of a new silk fibroin scaffold for meniscal repair
Published in
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Warnecke, Svenja Stein, Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Luisa de Roy, Nick Skaer, Robert Walker, Oliver Kessler, Anita Ignatius, Lutz Dürselen

Abstract

Meniscal injury is typically treated surgically via partial meniscectomy, which has been shown to cause cartilage degeneration in the long-term. Consequently, research has focused on meniscal prevention and replacement. However, none of the materials or implants developed for meniscal replacement have yet achieved widespread acceptance or demonstrated conclusive chondroprotective efficacy. A redesigned silk fibroin scaffold, which already displayed promising results regarding biocompatibility and cartilage protection in a previous study, was characterised in terms of its biomechanical, structural and biological functionality to serve as a potential material for permanent partial meniscal replacement. Therefore, different quasi-static but also dynamic compression tests were performed. However, the determined compressive stiffness (0.56 ± 0.31 MPa and 0.30 ± 0.12 MPa in relaxation and creep configuration, respectively) was higher in comparison to the native meniscal tissue, which could potentially disturb permanent integration into the host tissue. Nevertheless, µ-CT analysis met the postulated requirements for partial meniscal replacement materials in terms of the microstructural parameters, like mean pore size (215.6 ± 10.9 µm) and total porosity (80.1 ± 4.3%). Additionally, the biocompatibility was reconfirmed during cell culture experiments. The current study provides comprehensive mechanical and biological data for the characterisation of this potential replacement material. Although some further optimisation of the silk fibroin scaffold may be advantageous, the silk fibroin scaffold showed sufficient biomechanical competence to support loads already in the early postoperative phase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Materials Science 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,852,306
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#284
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,148
of 342,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.