↓ Skip to main content

Tracking the glossopharyngeal nerve pathway through anatomical references in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a pictorial review

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Tracking the glossopharyngeal nerve pathway through anatomical references in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a pictorial review
Published in
Insights into Imaging, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13244-018-0630-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

José María García Santos, Sandra Sánchez Jiménez, Marta Tovar Pérez, Matilde Moreno Cascales, Javier Lailhacar Marty, Miguel A. Fernández-Villacañas Marín

Abstract

The glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN) is a rarely considered cranial nerve in imaging interpretation, mainly because clinical signs may remain unnoticed, but also due to its complex anatomy and inconspicuousness in conventional cross-sectional imaging. In this pictorial review, we aim to conduct a comprehensive review of the GPN anatomy from its origin in the central nervous system to peripheral target organs. Because the nerve cannot be visualised with conventional imaging examinations for most of its course, we will focus on the most relevant anatomical references along the entire GPN pathway, which will be divided into the brain stem, cisternal, cranial base (to which we will add the parasympathetic pathway leaving the main trunk of the GPN at the cranial base) and cervical segments. For that purpose, we will take advantage of cadaveric slices and dissections, our own developed drawings and schemes, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cross-sectional images from our hospital's radiological information system and picture and archiving communication system. • The glossopharyngeal nerve is one of the most hidden cranial nerves. • It conveys sensory, visceral, taste, parasympathetic and motor information. • Radiologists' knowledge must go beyond the limitations of conventional imaging techniques. • The nerve's pathway involves the brain stem, cisternal, skull base and cervical segments. • Systematising anatomical references will help with nerve pathway tracking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 18 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#19,015,393
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#797
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,748
of 332,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.